Good design does more with less. By using only what we need and selecting durable, low-impact, and healthy materials across their life cycles, we can reduce costs, protect precious resources, and support health and well-being.
6.1 Product Category Screening  
6.1
Optional: 4 points

Product Category Screening  

  
RATIONALE
Screening materials for embodied carbon and health impacts during early design phases allows project teams to examine and adjust their material choices to more positively impact the health of people and the planet. Screening the types of products selected during early design phases equips teams with information they can use to make informed decisions about product selection while options are still flexible and not yet associated with change-order fees. Early screening empowers project teams to explore and track the impacts of their choices and prioritize opportunities for positive material impact within and across projects.
REQUIREMENTS
During the concept or schematic design phase, project teams must perform a screening exercise — a high-level review of product categories — to understand the embodied carbon and material health implications of their initial product selections. This step is intended to inform project teams’ design decisions, not to finalize product selections.

To perform the screening, complete all of the following [4 points]:

  • Select at least three product categories to screen for embodied carbon and at least three product categories to screen for material health from the product category lists below. Categories should align with materials most likely to be used in the project, prioritized by volume.
  • Select at least one screening resource to evaluate materials for their embodied carbon impacts and one screening resource to evaluate materials for potential health impacts.
  • Use the Green Communities Product Category Screening Template to document the screening results for the project’s initial material health and embodied carbon impacts and, if applicable, identify opportunities to avoid the worst impacts from products by shifting to those with lower embodied carbon and/or with lower risk of potential negative health impacts.
  • Share the screening results with appropriate team members, including designers, general contractor, relevant trades, and sustainability consultants.
  • Ensure team members consider the screening results when selecting products, writing specifications, and procuring products and materials.
  1. Embodied carbon screening

Choose at least three of the following product categories to screen for embodied carbon:

  • Cladding, exterior wall
  • Concrete
  • Flooring
  • Gypsum
  • Insulation
  • Steel
  • Wood, composite
  • Wood, non-composite

Use at least one of the following resources to screen the selected product categories for their impacts related to embodied carbon. Evaluate the product categories’ global warming potential (GWP) assuming a project use of 60 years; prioritize percentage reduction in kgCO2e/m2:

  • Embodied Carbon in Construction Calculator (EC3)
  • BEAM Estimator
  • Kaleidoscope: Embodied Carbon Design Tool
  • ZeroGuide
  • C.Scale
  • Athena Impact
  • Tally
  • Carbon Designer 3D (CD3D) by One Click LCA
  • Common Materials Framework (CMF) climate health impact area
  1. Material health screening

Choose at least three of the following product categories to screen for material health:

  • Adhesives and sealants, wet-applied interior
  • Cladding, exterior wall
  • Flooring
  • Insulation
  • Paint, interior
  • Wood, composite

Use at least one of the following resources to screen the selected product categories for their impacts related to human health. Evaluate the product categories for specific substances of concern and prioritize avoidance or removal of these substances.

  • Common Materials Framework (CMF) human health impact area
  • Habitable’s Informed product guidance and benchmarking tools
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Use education and screening to understand the impact of your current practice and identify opportunities to improve.
  • A simple way to rank materials within product categories is to focus on the scale and scope of their potential impacts. For example, try classifying materials in a product category as “good, better, best” or “red, yellow, green.” Then seek opportunities to reduce or avoid use of the materials that contribute the worst health and/or carbon attributes.
  • Apply what you have learned to achieve Criterion 6.4 Advanced Material Selection.
  • Hold a team meeting to share and discuss the results of the screening. Include all relevant team members who impact material selection, procurement, and installation.
RESOURCES

Embodied carbon resources:

  • mindful MATERIALS, Common Materials Framework (CMF) Reference Guide. The CMF is a shared “language” for product sustainability across five impact areas: human health, climate health, ecosystem health, social health and equity, and circular economy. Use the CMF reference guide, technology partners, and priority factors to guide material screening. www.mindfulmaterials.com/cmf-reference-guide
  • Carbon Leadership Forum (CLF), Tools for Measuring Embodied Carbon. https://carbonleadershipforum.org/tools-for-measuring-embodied-carbon/
  • Architecture 2030, Carbon Smart Materials Palette. A tool for understanding the highest-priority product categories for reducing embodied carbon. www.materialspalette.org/palette/
  • Building Transparency, EC3. The Embodied Carbon in Construction Calculator is a free database of environmental product declarations (EPDs), used for product selection and procurement. www.buildingtransparency.org/tools/#epd-database
  • Builders for Climate Action, BEAM Estimator. An emissions calculator for comparing biobased and conventional building materials. www.buildersforclimateaction.org/beam-estimator.html
  • Payette, Kaleidoscope: Embodied Carbon Design Tool. A reference library comparing impacts of common assembly types. www.payette.com/kaleidoscope/
  • NBBJ, ZeroGuide. An early-phase tool to support embodied carbon analysis. Note that ZeroGuide is browser-based and requires Chrome or Firefox. https://zeroguide.nbbj.com/
  • C.Scale. A tool for early and mid-stage carbon assessments based on multiple scenarios to compare the impact of different carbon-reduction strategies. www.cscale.io/
  • Tally. A subscription-based software plug-in that calculates environmental impact of building materials for whole building analysis as well as comparative analysis of design options. https://choosetally.com/
  • Athena Impact. A freestanding software package that can be used to complete WBLCA or to compare building assemblies and materials. The tool includes a wide range of materials for structural systems, enclosures, and interiors across all life-cycle stages. https://calculatelca.com/software/impact-estimator/
  • One Click LCA, Carbon Designer 3D (CD3D) is a design tool to address early carbon optimization, identify carbon hotspots, and benchmark different structural frames. https://oneclicklca.com/en/resources/articles/carbon-designer-3d-guide
  • CARE (Carbon Avoided Retrofit Estimator) Tool. A comparison tool for concept and schematic design. Models total carbon impacts, both operational and embodied carbon, of an existing building as-is, renovating an existing building, and replacing it with a new one. www.caretool.org/
Material health resources:
  • Habitable, Informed. A screening tool with intuitive red-to-green color ranking, based on in-depth research about the health impacts of chemicals throughout the product life cycle. https://informed.habitablefuture.org/
  • mindful MATERIALS. Common Materials Framework (CMF) Reference Guide. The CMF is a shared “language” for product sustainability across five impact areas: human health, climate health, ecosystem health, social health and equity, and circular economy. Use the CMF reference guide and priority factors to guide material screening. A variety of technology partners offer product-search tools that include CMF filters. www.mindfulmaterials.com/cmf-reference-guide
6.2 Reduction of Materials and Waste
6.2
Mandatory; Optional: 6 points maximum

Reduction of Materials and Waste

 
RATIONALE

Buildings drive high demand for global resources, and smarter design choices — such as scaling appropriately, minimizing material use, and designing for disassembly — can create cost savings while cutting carbon emissions and advancing other sustainability goals.

In addition to demanding resources, many common building materials cause pollution during their manufacture, installation, use, or disposal, often with significant impacts on the health of people and the environment. Producing and transporting new materials, and disposing of them in landfills, can also contribute to climate change. Some of the best ways to reduce costs while also reducing the potential negative environmental and health impacts of materials involve avoiding the use of a material altogether and reusing existing buildings or materials.

Alongside reducing material use, it is important to consider materials that are discarded during renovation, demolition, and construction. Construction and demolition (C&D) waste accounts for about 30% of all landfill waste in the U.S. Much of this waste has the potential to be recovered or recycled, helping reduce overall demand for new materials. To help that happen in the future, teams can design and build for adaptability, disassembly, and material reuse.

Modular construction methods reduce construction waste due to efficient manufacturing opportunities, and they often lend themselves to disassembly. With components assembled in a controlled factory setting, prefabrication can also save time and money.

REQUIREMENTS
Mandatory

New Construction and Substantial Rehabs: Implement at least two material reduction strategies (letters A through L) from the three strategy lists below — strategies relating to design, construction, or potential future uses. No optional points are awarded for the two mandatory strategies implemented.

Moderate Rehabs: Implement at least one material reduction strategy from the three lists below — strategies relating to design, construction, or potential future uses. No optional points are awarded for the one mandatory strategy implemented.

Optional
All projects: Project teams may select additional strategies from the three strategy lists below to accrue optional points. [2 points per strategy, 6 points maximum]
Material reduction through design
  • Right-size the structural system. Optimize building and structural bay dimensions, member sizing and shape, and material strengths. For example, use advanced framing techniques for low-rise housing. For larger buildings, use the lowest concrete strength needed at each structural condition rather than one concrete strength for the entire project. Submit a plan or diagram illustrating the areas of the building that were optimized and describe the reduction in volume of concrete and steel as compared to the original design or to a typical design from your organization.
  • Combine systems or eliminate finishes. Combine or eliminate at least two systems or finishes where not necessary for other purposes (e.g., polished concrete floors instead of flooring finish over slab). Submit final specifications and highlight eliminated systems and finishes. Quantify the material reductions.
  • Design based on standard product dimensions to minimize waste (e.g., if using a 2-foot tile or plank floor, design floor dimensions in 2-foot increments) for at least three product categories. Provide dimensional drawings indicating product module and a waste calculation showing the expected percentage of material waste across the project. Waste percentage should not exceed 5% of the total material used.
  • Implement industrialized modular construction methods. Integrate off-site, prefabricated volumetric, or panelized manufacturing for at least 50% of the square footage of all buildings in the project scope.
  • Use salvaged materials for at least 15% of an entire product category. Product categories can include flooring, ceilings, doors, glazing (windows, glass partitions, etc.), millwork, lighting, plumbing fixtures, insulation, landscape paving, or furniture. For example, ensure 15 of 100 installed interior doors were salvaged, or that 150 square feet out of 1,000 square feet of wood flooring was reclaimed. Document the products, quantity used, and original source.
Construction waste reduction
  • For projects with deconstruction or demolition scope: Complete a salvage assessment during design or prior to demolition. Identify all building materials, soils, and landscaping for removal and their approximate quantity. Reuse, donate, sell, or otherwise divert from landfill at least 35%.
  • Divert at least 50% of construction waste by weight from landfill by salvaging or recycling. Detail this through a waste-management plan.
  • Recycle all waste generated on the site for at least two of the following product waste types: cardboard, wood, drywall, metals, concrete, brick, asphalt, insulation, carpet, and plastics (e.g., PVC piping, plastic sheeting).
Future waste reduction
  • Develop end-of-use guidance for five product categories and include the guidance in materials developed per Criterion 8.1 Building Operations & Maintenance Manual and Plan. Product categories can include flooring, ceilings, doors, glazing, millwork, lighting, plumbing fixtures, furniture, roofing, or siding. Identify the products and describe their locations in the building, installed quantities, anticipated life spans, and recommended actions to either 1) salvage them for reuse, sale, or donation; or 2) recover them for recycling. Include information for specific organizations or businesses that will assist with end of use.
  • Install products with extended producer responsibility programs, such as take-back programs or product leasing (“product as a service”). These products must constitute at least 75% of at least three product categories referenced in Criterion 6.1 Product Category Screening. Provide a list of the product categories, products, installed quantities, and program information. These programs are currently most common for furniture, appliances, and finishes (e.g., flooring, tile, ceilings).
  • Identify and implement at least three opportunities for disassembly. For example, use reversible mechanical fasteners to allow for disassembly where adhesives or welds would typically be used. Provide a list of the assemblies, their locations in the building, the quantity of recoverable materials, and guidance or diagrams on the disassembly method.
  • Modular design for disassembly: Design for and implement modular construction methods that are also designed for disassembly. Provide guidance on the disassembly method.
RECOMMENDATIONS

Reduction through design:

  • For structure, consider braced frames instead of moment frames. Instead of wide flange sections, consider joists, trusses, or castellated beams. These configurations are material-efficient methods of supporting loads.
  • Using HVAC systems with less ductwork can allow for smaller ceiling plenums and shorter floor-to-floor heights.
  • When selecting gypsum board, use thinner board (1/2 inch instead of 5/8 inch) where the greater thickness is not needed for fire rating or other performance requirements.
  • Reclaimed materials can be sourced from deconstruction sites, salvage wholesalers and retailers, attic stock, or manufacturers’ surplus stock.
  • When specifying concrete strengths to reduce material needed, also consider performance specifications instead of a specific “recipe” for concrete. Performance specs give the supplier flexibility to meet structural performance requirements as well as sustainability goals, especially embodied carbon goals.

Construction waste reduction:

  • Implement on-site separation of materials to the greatest extent feasible to help ensure a higher-quality product for recycling.
  • Consider donating salvaged materials to nonprofit organizations or returning them through manufacturer take-back programs.
  • For rehab projects: Consider recycling carpet when carpeting is being removed. The specification language below may be customized and included to determine whether carpet recycling is feasible and cost effective in your locale.
    • » Vendor shall supply a price quote to recycle carpet and carpet components at 100%, 50%, and 30% of product tonnage.
    • » Property manager shall identify the existing carpet product and polymers (e.g. polypropylene, nylon 6, or nylon 6,6), as documented in the carpet specification. This will enable the carpet vendor to ascertain the recyclability of the product.
  • Create a feedback loop on waste generation from the site to the person responsible for material purchasing and/or paying disposal costs. The feedback loop could be as simple as a photo record of the dumpster after each major stage of construction, shared back with the materials purchaser who tracks disposal costs. Use this information to inform purchasing decisions and minimize waste.
  • Create detailed framing plans or scopes of work and accompanying architectural details for use on the jobsite to proactively reduce waste. Create a detailed cut list and lumber order prior to construction.
  • Ask manufacturers if they take back offcuts or old materials for recycling. This may be possible for drywall, flooring, or ceilings.
  • Detail expectations for construction waste management in the project documentation (construction specification Division 1, Section 01 74 19).
  • Investigate and document local options for reusing or recycling all anticipated major constituents of the project waste stream, including cardboard packaging and consumer recyclables (e.g., beverage containers used by the construction team).

Design for disassembly:

  • Detail assembly components to be independent so they can be replaced or removed without impacting adjacent assemblies. For example, surface-mount fixtures, devices, and conduit, instead of recessing them into walls.
  • Ensure fasteners for dismantling are visible and accessible.
RESOURCES
6.3 Reduction of Lead Hazards in Pre-1978 Buildings
6.3
Mandatory for Substantial Rehabs of buildings constructed before 1978

Reduction of Lead Hazards in Pre-1978 Buildings

RATIONALE
Lead content in old paint is one of the most common causes of lead poisoning. Exposure to lead dust, lead in soil, and deteriorated lead-based paint poses significant risks — especially to children who are younger than six years old and people who are pregnant or nursing— affecting long-term neurological development and learning. In rare cases, extreme lead exposure can result in death. In homes built before 1978, the year the federal government banned consumer uses of lead-based paint, risk of exposure remains. Opportunities exist to control those lead hazards in buildings as part of renovation projects.
REQUIREMENTS
Reduce the risk of lead exposure by implementing one of the two options below. For both options, ensure that the people testing and remediating lead understand and adhere to lead-safe work practices to minimize and contain dust.
Option 1: Lead paint assessment and abatement
Conduct a lead risk assessment or inspection to identify lead hazards. Control identified lead hazards using lead abatement or interim controls. Follow U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state and/or local laws and requirements, where applicable. Check state or local regulations for additional requirements for lead-safe work pertaining to prohibited practices, notification, worker training and certification, and clearance dust training.
Option 2: Lead paint hazard reduction
If the project is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, follow standard lead treatments defined by HUD as a series of hazard-reduction measures designed to reduce all lead-based paint hazards in a dwelling unit without the benefit of a risk assessment or other evaluation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Remove windows that have deteriorated lead-based paint and replace with energy-efficient windows.
  • A lead inspection should be undertaken by an EPA-certified risk assessor to determine whether paint in a rehab project contains lead. Otherwise, paint should be presumed to contain lead, and lead-safe work practices are required.
  • Perform dust lead clearance testing at the conclusion of renovation work; compare against EPA dust lead clearance standards.
  • Remove or cover lead-contaminated soil so that it is inaccessible to children. If covering, all bare soil should be covered with 2 to 4 inches of clean soil, compost, or mulch.
  • For gardening, use raised beds with lead-free soil.
RESOURCES
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Lead Abatement, Inspection, and Risk Assessment. Learn the regulations and locate certified firms to complete lead abatement. www.epa.gov/lead/lead-abatement-inspection-and-risk-assessment
  • EPA; Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting Program (a.k.a. the RRP Rule). Understand how the rules and regulations for lead abatement apply to different entities, including contractors and property managers. www.epa.gov/lead/lead-renovation-repair-and-painting-program
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes (OLHCHH). Access resources, training, and funding opportunities for lead-safe housing. www.hudexchange.info/programs/lead-hazard-control-and-healthy-homes-programs/
6.4 Advanced Material Selection
6.4
Mandatory; Optional: 31 points maximum

Advanced Material Selection

 
RATIONALE
Many building products contain hazardous chemicals or have significant embodied carbon footprints, contributing to environmental degradation and, in the context of affordable housing, potentially exacerbating environmental and health inequities. But a growing number of product types perform well across both health and climate impacts. By selecting materials from a vetted “best-in-class” list, project teams can reduce exposure to toxic chemicals, limit greenhouse gas emissions, and simplify their material selection process. The categories included below take priority because they are typically procured in high volumes in affordable housing, they address materials most likely to have negative health impacts, and they have implementable and affordable solutions available.

Acknowledging that not all housing developments can select the best-in-class material types, however, this criterion offers alternatives and provides guidance on product selection by addressing the following across priority categories:

  • VOC content and emissions: Exposure to certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and mixtures of VOCs can cause or aggravate health conditions — both to jobsite workers who install or apply VOC-containing products and to people who live or work in spaces where VOCs off-gas from products continually over time. The requirements below address both VOC content and VOC emissions to reduce the risk of health impacts to installers, residents, and staff.
  • Healthier material selection: By selecting products that are less toxic across their life cycles, from extraction through installation and beyond, project teams can reduce health risks for building occupants as well as jobsite workers, fenceline communities, and the public.
  • Embodied carbon: Greenhouse gas emissions associated with extracting, manufacturing, transporting, and disposing of products are called embodied carbon or embodied emissions. Materials make up a significant amount of a property’s carbon footprint and represent the environmental and health impacts of a building on day one, even before any lights or equipment are turned on.
REQUIREMENTS
Use products that comply with the specifications below.

Notes for all product categories:

  • Percentages of installed quantities are by cost or volume within the product category, except where existing materials are preserved or repaired.
  • “CDPH Standard Method” refers to the Standard Method for the Testing and Evaluation of Volatile Organic Chemical Emissions from Indoor Sources using Environmental Chambers, version 1.2, from the California Department of Public Health.
  • PFAS, commonly known as “forever chemicals,” are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, which are common coatings on consumer products, including food containers. In construction, they are often used on textiles, window treatments, and exteriors to repel dirt and stains.
Adhesives and sealants, wet-applied interior
Mandatory
For adhesives and sealants applied inside the air barrier:
  • VOC content is less than or equal to the thresholds provided by the most recent version of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 1168 available at the time of product specification.
  • VOC emissions of 80% by volume are verified as meeting the CDPH Standard Method for the school or residential scenario.
Cladding, exterior wall
Optional
If not preserved or repaired existing cladding, 100% of exterior wall cladding is expanded cork board, natural wood (including heat treated), bamboo, engineered wood, thin brick, natural stone, ceramic, terra-cotta, lime plaster, or fiber cement. [2 points]
Concrete
Optional

Use the most recent Carbon Leadership Forum North American Material Baselines report or current, regional industry-average environmental product declarations (EPDs) to determine typical impact values per concrete strength class in the property’s location. Provide a product-specific EPD for at least 90% of newly installed concrete, demonstrating global warming potential (GWP) that is either:

  • 20% lower than the regional average [5 points]
  • No higher than the regional average [2 points]
Flooring
Mandatory
Implement Option 1: Best-in-class flooring standards or Option 2: Minimum flooring standards below. Points are available for selecting Option 1 or for going beyond the minimum standards in Option 2.
Option 1: Best-in-class flooring standards

A minimum of 90% of all flooring is a combination of 1) repaired existing floor, 2) linoleum, 3) solid wood flooring that is FSC-certified or salvaged wood, 4) pre-finished engineered wood or bamboo, 5) pre-finished cork (excluding rubber/cork composite), 6) no floorcovering (e.g., concrete or CLT structural slab without a finish or sealer) or 7) ceramic / porcelain tile (no added lead). [4 points]

OR

Option 2: Minimum flooring standards
  • All flooring products are either an inherently nonemitting source of VOCs (such as unfinished stone or porcelain tile) or have VOC emissions verified as meeting the requirements of the CDPH Standard Method for school or residential scenarios.
  • No carpet may be installed in building entryways, laundry rooms, bathrooms, kitchens/ kitchenettes, or utility rooms. Walk-off mats manufactured especially for that purpose are acceptable at entryways.
  • None of the below may be installed:
    • » Flexible PVC with phthalates (in either vinyl flooring or carpet backings)
    • » Rubber or rubber–cork flooring made with tire-derived crumb rubber
    • » Carpet with intentionally added PFAS stain-repellant treatments
  • Fluid-applied finish floors may be installed only in spaces that are not regularly occupied, such as mechanical rooms.
Optional

Project teams implementing Option 2: Minimum flooring standards may also select any, all, or none of the below for points:

  • All flooring adhesives, coating, and sealants, whether pre-applied or site-applied, do not contain PFAS. Site-applied flooring adhesives, coatings, and sealants meet CDPH Standard Method emission requirements and do not contain epoxy or polyurethane. [1 point]
  • No carpet is installed anywhere in the project. [1 point]
  • No vinyl flooring is installed anywhere in the project. [1 point]
Gypsum wallboard
Optional
At least 60% of all newly installed interior gypsum wallboard is lightweight gypsum board AND meets CDPH Standard Method emission requirements. [2 points]
Insulation
Mandatory

Implement Option 1: Best-in-class insulation standards, Option 2: Intermediate insulation standards, or Option 3: Minimum insulation standards below.

Points are available for selecting Option 1 or Option 2.

Option 1: Best-in-class insulation standards
At least 75% of all newly installed above-grade insulation (exterior and interior) is bio-based, such as wood fiber, hemp fiber, cellulose or cotton, hempcrete, or straw. All other insulation meets the minimum requirements in Option 3. [5 points]
Option 2: Intermediate insulation standards
At least 90% of all newly installed above-grade insulation (exterior and interior) is bio-based (acceptable materials are listed in Option 1), fiberglass batts, formaldehyde-free mineral wool batts, and/or unfaced fiberglass or mineral wool boards. [3 points]
Option 3: Minimum insulation standards
  • Mineral wool batt insulation, if used, is formaldehyde free.
  • Two-part spray polyurethane foam may be used in limited scope only to establish a sealed air barrier if no other viable material options are available.
  • Foam insulation, if used, has blowing agents with low global warming potential (GWP150).
Paint and other coatings, wet-applied interior
Mandatory

Implement Option 1: Best-in-class paint and coating standards, Option 2: Intermediate paint and coating standards, or Option 3: Minimum paint and coating standards below.

Points are available for selecting Option 1 or Option 2.

Option 1: Best-in-class coating standards
At least 50% of all paints are mineral paint, such as lime or mineral silicate, and 90% of the remaining portion of paints, coatings, and primers meet the requirements of Option 3: Minimum coating standards. [4 points]
Option 2: Intermediate coating standards
At least 90% of interior paints, coatings, and primers are free of PFAS and alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEs) and meet the requirements of Option 3: Minimum paint and coating standards. Mineral paints are exempt from documentation. [2 points]
Option 3: Minimum coating standards

For interior paints, coatings, and primers:

  • VOC content is less than or equal to the thresholds provided by the most recent version of SCAQMD 1113 available at time of product specification.
  • VOC emissions of 90% by volume are verified as compliant with CDPH Standard Method for school or residential exposure scenarios.
Steel
Optional
Implement either Option 1 or Option 2 below.
Option 1: Best-in-class steel standards
Specify 100% steel produced by electric-arc furnace, and/or with at least 90% recycled content, instead of by blast furnace or basic oxygen furnace. [4 points]
Option 2: Intermediate steel standards
For 75% of steel deck and cold-formed steel framing AND For 75% of structural steel, specify products with global warming potential (GWP) at least 20% lower than baseline as indicated in the most recent Carbon Leadership Forum North American Material Baselines report. [3 points]
Wall coverings
Mandatory
Do not install wall coverings that contain vinyl.
Wood, composite
Mandatory
Formaldehyde emissions must be less than or equal to the thresholds provided by California Air Resources Board (CARB) Phase II Composite Wood Products Airborne Toxic Control Measure and/or Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Title IV for all hardwood plywood, particleboard, medium-density fiberboard (MDF), and these materials within other products (e.g., cabinets and doors).
Optional

In addition, teams may also select either, both, or none of the below.

  • All composite wood products are certified to have no added formaldehyde (NAF). [2 points]
  • At least 50% of composite wood installed as part of the project is certified to the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard. [2 points]
Wood, noncomposite
Optional
At least 50% of noncomposite wood installed as part of the project is certified to the Forest Stewardship Council standard. [2 points]
Table 6.4a | Selected limits for wet-applied adhesives and sealants: SQACMD 1168
As of October 9, 2025

Product Type

Maximum VOC limit (G/L)

Carpet pad adhesives

 50

Wood flooring adhesives

120

Rubber floor adhesives

 60

Subfloor adhesives

 50

Vinyl composition tile and 
asphalt tile adhesives

 50

Drywall and panel adhesives

 50

Cove base adhesives

 50

Multipurpose construction 
adhesives

 70

Structural glazing adhesives

100

Structural wood member adhesive

140

Architectural sealants: clear, 
paintable, and immediately water-resistant

250

Architectural sealant primers: nonporous

250

Architectural sealant primers: 
porous

775

Table 6.4b | Selected limits for wet-applied Paints and other coatings: SQACMD 1113
As of October 9, 2025

Product Type

Maximum VOC limit (G/L)

Primers, sealers, and undercoatings

100

Coatings, flats and non-flats, 
and floor

 50

Rust-preventive coatings

100

Wood coatings

275

Stains, interior

250

Tub and tile refinishing coatings

420

RECOMMENDATIONS

VOC content and emissions:

  • Reduce VOC exposure and negative health impacts in interior applications. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds ensure that products have limited VOC content, and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) emission standard ensures that products are verified to have limited indoor emissions of the specific VOCs tested.
  • For all wet-applied materials, be sure to closely follow manufacturers’ instructions, paying particular attention to appropriate safety gear and ventilation requirements during installation and curing.
  • If residents are in place while potentially hazardous materials are being used, take extra precautions. Residents should be moved out of the building during product application and for the duration of the curing period noted by the manufacturer.

Embodied carbon:

  • To compare design choices beyond individual product selection, whole-building or assembly-level life-cycle assessments (LCAs) can be conducted. Free tools are available for all stages of design, from concept to construction documents. They help estimate the quantities of materials used in a design and reference EPD databases to calculate the total global warming potential (GWP) of the assembly or building being assessed.
  • A material may have a higher carbon footprint but also greater durability, resulting in fewer replacements over a building’s lifespan. The assumed frequency of product replacement over a building’s life cycle can be accounted for in a whole-building LCA to help weigh a product’s durability against the negative impacts — including costs — associated with replacing it.
  • For ready-mixed concrete, consider performance specifications rather than conventional prescriptive “recipes.” Performance specs can require a GWP maximum alongside strength class, allowing suppliers greater flexibility in customizing the mix to meet the specifications.

Labor rights and supply-chain transparency:

  • Source materials from suppliers and manufacturers that demonstrate a commitment to fair labor practices. This includes safe working conditions, fair wages, and the absence of child labor or forced labor. Consider these actions in addition to material health and embodied carbon:
    • » Prioritize manufacturers with third-party certifications indicating appropriate supply-chain risk management.
    • » See Design for Freedom’s high-risk product list ( www.designforfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Ethical-Materials-Tracking-Schedule-DFF-Guidance-and-Toolkit.xlsx) and identify any high-risk products in the project. Consider the country of origin for the project’s selection of those products and compare against the high-risk locations for those products.
    • » Sourcing from countries with comprehensive and enforced labor laws is a more reliable (though not guaranteed) way to procure ethically.
    • » Use reclaimed and salvaged materials to reduce demand for extraction of raw materials, in which forced labor can be prevalent.
RESOURCES
  • Health Product Declaration Collaborative (HPDC). Creator of the health product declaration (HPD), a standard for disclosing product ingredients and their health hazards. Review HPDC’s materials, including its repository of HPDs, to more easily find products with fewer hazards or lower concentrations of potentially toxic chemicals. www.hpd-collaborative.org/
  • mindful MATERIALS, Common Materials Framework (CMF) Reference Guide. The CMF is a shared “language” for product sustainability across five impact areas: human health, climate health, ecosystem health, social health & equity, and circular economy. Use the CMF reference guide, technology partners, and priority factors to guide material screening. www.mindfulmaterials.com/cmf-reference-guide
  • Pratt, Healthy Materials Lab. Helps teams select healthier building products that are also affordable as well as products with low embodied carbon. https://healthymaterialslab.org/material-collections/healthier-affordable-products
  • Habitable and Perkins&Will, Embodied Carbon and Material Health in Insulation, Gypsum Drywall, and Flooring. Investigates the intersection of carbon impacts and material health in three of the most common building materials. https://habitablefuture.org/resources/embodied-carbon-and-material-health-in-insulation/
  • Habitable. This product guidance tool compiles decades of comprehensive research on the health impacts of chemicals throughout the product life cycle. https://informed.habitablefuture.org/
  • Architecture 2030, Carbon Smart Materials Palette. A guide to common building materials with high-impact potential for emissions reductions, along with alternative materials and whole-building solutions. www.materialspalette.org/palette/

Product selection resources for VOC limits:

Embodied carbon standards and tools:

Supply-chain fair-labor transparency

6.5 Recycling Storage
6.5
Optional: 2 points

Recycling Storage

RATIONALE
Recycling prevents usable materials from entering the waste stream. Providing bins within the living space for separating recyclables from trash encourages higher rates of recycling.
REQUIREMENTS

For projects in locations with municipal recycling infrastructure and/or recycling haulers, provide separate bins for the collection of trash and recycling in each dwelling unit and all shared community rooms. For multifamily buildings, provide an area for separate bins (trash and recycling) or separate trash chutes for each floor. Additionally, provide clear signage and labeling to distinguish recycling bins from general trash bins at all communal recycling and trash sites. Ensure the project’s trash and recycling facilities are easily accessible to all residents and are sized appropriately for the number of residents being served.

For projects in locations without municipal recycling infrastructure or recycling haulers, advocate to the local waste hauler or municipality for regular collection of recyclables. Commit to providing recycling bins if service becomes available.

RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Ensure that the recycling program has management support. Include procedures in materials developed per Criterion 8.1 Building Operations & Maintenance Manual and Plan and the Criterion 8.3 Resident Manual.
  • Ensure that signage and bin colors are consistent across the project and with local community norms where applicable. Consider opportunities for functional artwork through creative or artistic recycling containers.
  • Add additional recycling bins or collection areas for paper and cardboard in locations where residents routinely check their mail.
  • Identify local waste handlers and buyers for glass, plastic, metals, office paper, newspaper, cardboard, batteries, electronics, and organic waste. This may include artists or public art organizations seeking to divert solid waste by creating art from recycled materials.
  • Make recycling accessible to your resident population. In multifamily buildings, instruct occupants on recycling procedures through clear and visible signs that include pictures. Ensure instructions appear in a variety of languages spoken by residents. Use signs with large and/or raised letters to support people who are blind or have limited vision.
  • Incorporate composting alongside recycling where local compost collection or community composting programs exist. Provide separate bins with clear instructions.
RESOURCES
“It’s the nicest apartment I’ve ever had. I have more freedom now. It made my life easier.”